Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tyciol/Bad Zelda

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:16, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Tyciol/Bad Zelda
I would normally never want to interfere with someone's own userspace, however I'm making an exception to this one. It violates a fair amount of UP, and mostly seems to serve as some descriptions and links to fanfic porn. Given that the user has been blocked, I assume this won't be too controversial. Yaksar (let's chat) 03:13, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - Indef. full block (user page/talk page/mail etc.) Page is full of links that must go. --Kudpung (talk) 18:32, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Noindexed, so not going to be randomly found, and contains no porn in itself. I suspect there is a long story about the block (3 minths from last edit to block) Tyciol was apparently a "redirectionist" making marginal redirects over a period of time? Collect (talk) 21:47, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Regardless of the terms of the block, it still seems to violate most of WP:UP.--Yaksar (let's chat) 22:12, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Um - give specific reasons. "It violates almost everything" is not a strong argument. Collect (talk) 13:12, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Sure. The first four bullets in "Writings, information, discussions, and activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals." WP:FAKEARTICLE. --Yaksar (let's chat) 17:28, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * 1. Userspace pages are not required to be encyclopedia articles. 2. Notability is not required in userspace, 3. Many pages in userspace are not "closely related to Wikipedia's goals," nor is that a requirement in userspace.  4. The article does not attack anyone or bring disrepute on WP, nor does it advance commercial spam on WP.   Seems clear that requiring that all userspace pages be encyclopedia pages would reduce userspace by over 98%. YMMV, but I do not find it a strong argument for deletion. Collect (talk) 19:05, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
 * "Extensive writings and material on topics having virtually no chance whatsoever of being directly useful to the project, its community, or an encyclopedia article. (For example in the latter case, because it is pure original research, is in complete disregard of reliable sources, or is clearly unencyclopedic for other clear reasons.)"--Yaksar (let's chat) 19:19, 13 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT, which states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Because this page violates WP:STALEDRAFT and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 05:11, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The edits to the page since November 2009 have been of a trivial nature, in that no sources were found and added. Because this was deleted at Bat Zelda on 8 April 2006 per Articles for deletion/Bad Zelda, and because no evidence of notability has surfaced in nearly five years, this page should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 05:11, 16 February 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.