Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/AAHA-Gamblers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep, speedy close per WP:SNOW. Non-admin closure by Skomorokh  09:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

User:UBX/AAHA-Gamblers
Nominated by for speedy deletion because of "the team is now defunct". As this is not a valid reason, I am listing it here for him. Regards  So Why  08:52, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. "the team is now defunct" is no reason at all. Some fans will mourn for life! Note I do not support any team let alone this one, but I do observe sports fan with some amusement. -- Bduke   (Discussion)  09:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep There is no reason for a person to automatically be denied that ability to say he is a "fan" of anything on the basis of any WP rules or guidelines. I know people who still say they are fans of the "Brooklyn Dodgers" for example. Are we to say "No, you can not be a fan of them"?  And "Washington Nats" was not a team for years -- would we have to go back and undelete putatively decades-old templates when it was reborn? My opinion -- let people say whatever team they are fans of, and not worry about it. Collect (talk) 11:35, 18 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and urge withdrawal or speedy close. Acceptable userbox in userspace. Newyorkbrad (talk) 03:42, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep We  have no right to decide what teams people can support. --J.Mundo (talk) 14:44, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.