Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UBX/The Kliq


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. I've deleted the template speedily under CSD#U1. No need for process for the sake of process. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

User:UBX/The Kliq
The Kliq is a former Wikipedia editing stable that has disbanded. The userbox is no longer needed, so it can be deleted. I tagged it for speedy deletion, but the tag was removed. -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 20:54, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * iMatthew, have all the editors from the "Kliq" agreed to disband? If so, I'll speedy delete the userbox as originally requested, and close this MFD.  Let me know.  Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  20:57, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The group officially disbanded a while ago, and I've contacted all former members on their approval of the deletion of the userbox. Once there they put their two cents in, I think it's ok to have deleted. -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 21:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * I declined the speedy because iMatthew was not the creator (request was tagged with u1) and there's at least 1 person still using the userbox. No prejudice to the MFD. xenocidic (talk) 21:01, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Declining the speedy was the right thing under those circumstances, but at the same time, a wide community input isn't necessary if the "authors" (being kliq members) all agree to let it go to the digital dustbin. :-) Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  21:03, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * agreed, as long as LAX (creator) and the person using it agree, I see no reason to force the MFD to run the entire length. xenocidic (talk) 21:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Sounds ok to me. -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 21:05, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * IDK, if my word helps, since I'm co-creator, but I was hoping that maybe we could have had the Kliq back. But, IDK if my word counts or not. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:20, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * That's not funny, Blue. (Absolutely not). The Kliq is no more, and never again. -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 23:40, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

If you particular editors want to fight out whether the "kliq" should exist, that's fine. Do it on your talkpages. This isn't the place for it. This is an MFD for a userbox, of all the triviality. Don't waste other editors' time with this social stuff -- if you have nothing better to do, I recommend improving articles, start by clicking here. Keeper  |   76   |   Disclaimer  23:43, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:NOT this is far too elitist to me. Come on guys lets move on to creating some articles and building a encyclopedia.  Tiptoety  talk 23:59, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
 * It appears ThinkBlue is in favor of its deletion. Tiptoety  talk 00:23, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * So who are we waiting on? No one?  Then delete it!   Keeper   |   76   |   Disclaimer  01:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * As I said on Tiptoety's talk page. We should wait for NiciVampireHeart's decision, as she currently uses the box. -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 01:09, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. It appears the user still using the box is using it in the sense of the pro wrestling stable, not as part of an editing group. Maybe the box should be kept, but the link repointed to the article.  Same box, new meaning.  --UsaSatsui (talk) 01:20, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Nici is using the box for the editing group. -- iMa tth ew  T.C. 01:32, 10 June 2008 (UTC)


 * I, just for the heck of it would like to mention WP:OWN. I mean, why are we sitting around waiting for the three or so user that claim to have started this "kliq" to tell the community when to delete and when not to delete content that is completely under their (the communities) control? This is a MfD, not a talk page where everyone gets together and discusses who owns the rights to the userbox and if the "leaders" approve of its deletion. Tiptoety  talk 03:05, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.