Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UY4Xe8VM5VYxaQQ/ChinaRaiser 2

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 02:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

User:UY4Xe8VM5VYxaQQ/ChinaRaiser 2


WP:FAKEARTICLE - have attempted to contact editor on their talk page a number of times, and have moved one of their attempts to the draft namespace in hope that they continue to work on it there. They repeatedly recreate this and then redirect their user page to it -- samtar talk or stalk 09:50, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The editor does not appear to be acting in good faith.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete. Doctored copy of ActRaiser 2. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Vomment Wikipedia is free content, with cc-by-sa license, so I can copy any content within wikipedia with attribution.UY4Xe8VM5VYxaQQ (talk) 02:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't think that is quite true. WP:COPYRIGHTS is one very important consideration, but certainly it is not the only one for writing information into Wikipedia.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * OpposeI never intend to counterfeit this as wikipedia articles, as I not alter the original article, is my work "for amusement only". UY4Xe8VM5VYxaQQ (talk) 11:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.