Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ultramarine/Hall of Fame Comments


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep. Xoloz 16:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

User:Ultramarine/Hall of Fame Comments

 * Delete the sole purpose of this subpage is to attack other users and thus it is a violation of WP:NPA. Jersey Devil 03:48, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * How? It only attacks me? :) Ultramarine 03:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The introductory comment is the following: "Ad hominem is unfortunately common in Wikipedia by those who have lost the factual discussion". This is followed by a listing of quotes by other users. Hence this is an attack page.--Jersey Devil 04:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh. Well, removed the introductory comment. Satisfied? Ultramarine 04:05, 21 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep The comments are not referenced back to the authors, and they are directed at UM. Yes, UM has really pissed me off, but I haven't yet made his wall of shame.  Seriously, this seems like a non-issue.  --Kevin Murray 04:00, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per Kevin Murray. Without the line that was removed, the page is just for fun, and Wikipedia is not censored. Yechiel Man  05:50, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: "Democratic peace opponents" is a failure to assume good faith; but it's better than calling these editors Marxists, as this used to do. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 21:40, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.