Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Umutcan123456/Next Country and City

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:28, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Umutcan123456/Next Country and City
Violation of WP:UP.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  19:46, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 21:58, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep One day != "indefinite" for sure. User is around - and nomination at the one day mark appears to be jumping the shark, er gun.  Nor does one day reasonably reach "long term" either. Collect (talk) 10:34, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep unless there is more to this than meets this eye. Draft copies are permitted and this page is brand new. However, this comment by the nominator makes me wonder if there is some past history here that needs to be explained. --RL0919 (talk) 10:44, 29 October 2010 (UTC) Changed position per new comment below. --RL0919 (talk) 20:23, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Here's the "history": This user was blocked for one week for overall disruption . The user added this to his talk page while blocked, and I removed it. He added it back, I removed it again, he added it back again, and I removed it again. At this point I revoked his talk page access, and he added the information to his user page with an IP sockpuppet (here). I re-blocked Umutcan123456 for block evasion as well as the IP for disruption again. Then the user created this subpage once his block expired.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  19:41, 29 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. Based on the nominator's reply to me and a review of User:Umutcan123456's contributions and user page history, I now have a better idea of what is going on here. Despite having an account since 2008, this user has only one minor mainspace edit ever. His edits are almost entirely to user and user talk. Starting earlier this month, he began copying article content onto his user page, apparently for decorative purposes (no hint of editing for article improvement), and edit-warred when others attempted to remove non-free images per WP:NFCC. This led to administrator involvement, with Eagles247 eventually removing the copied article material from Umutcan123456's user page, citing WP:UP. Rather than accept this situation or challenge it in some appropriate venue, Umutcan123456 chose to place the copied material on a sub-page, which is what is now nominated for deletion. Since the history of this suggests there is no intention of using these copies for any constructive purpose, I support the deletion. (Note: I have not linked specific diffs, but it should not be hard to find them since Umutcan123456 has very little contribution history other than this conflict.) --RL0919 (talk) 20:23, 29 October 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.