Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:UsLovePop




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete all. Tim Song (talk) 15:37, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

User:UsLovePop
Obviously not bad faith, but looks like a young (13/14) user creating multiple pages of made-up pop groups, songs, etc. Previous warning left on his Talk Page on 04/22. Unfortunately, the only response to this warning was for the user to create yet another new nonsense page on 04/25. Per the User's edit history almost everything he has done has been edits to these subpages. Approximately 3-4 edits to legit articles. - eo (talk) 14:45, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 * User:UsLovePop/Band
 * User:UsLovePop/Song1
 * User:UsLovePop/EP
 * User:UsLovePop/Song2
 * User:UsLovePop/Song3
 * User:UsLovePop/Song4
 * User:UsLovePop/Song5
 * User:UsLovePop/Liam
 * User:UsLovePop/S1
 * User:UsLovePop/S2 ← another new page created 04/27. - eo (talk) 10:02, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * User:UsLovePop/S3 ← another new page created 05/03. - eo (talk) 10:31, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note - User's reply here. In my opinion the pages do fall foul of the userspace guidelines, but whether carpet-bombing a newbie's userspace without getting them to understand why (with the view to them becoming an encyclopedic contributor) is a good idea, I'm not sure. We could at least try (again). If they really only seem to be here for the webspace, then the pages can be deleted. - Mobius Clock 20:45, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment I agree with this; based on his response on my Talk Page I don't think he fully understands why and/or he just did not bother to follow the link I left for him. If he made some productive edits that'd be one thing, but it doesn't seem as if he plans to use Wikipedia for anything else. - eo (talk) 15:04, 28 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE. Comments at User talk:Ericorbit suggest that the existence of videos at YouTube support the notability of L!am, but those videos appear to have been deleted from YouTube. At least, I cannot find them using the external link provided. I have no objections to going slow, as suggested by Mobius Clock, but I don't see a need for the subpages to be left in place for long while communicating with the user. Cnilep (talk) 16:39, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.