Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Utah Patriot




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. @harej 01:57, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

User:Utah Patriot
Violation of WP:UP in that it is a user page used for expressing an opinion unrelated to Wikipedia. Delete. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 17:30, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete User seems to be on a campaign. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:44, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete -- unrelated to Wikipedia. Singularity42 (talk) 17:58, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as a violation of WP:UP. Ironholds (talk) 18:19, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * This nomination is too bitey. He has been welcomed barely hours ago.  Considering "17:27, 9 September 2009 NawlinWiki (talk | contribs) deleted "Domestic Enemies of the US Constitution" ‎ (Expired PROD, concern was: WP:SOAP)"; the reposting on his userpage could be considered to be an act of disputing the prod, and he is entitled to a more gentle discussion.  The material is not so soapy as to be forbidden from userspace, if the user were to become a serious contributor.  A little more time should be allowed to see if he can improve the project in any way outside of a narrowly defined pet interest.  Some of wikipedia's best editors also did not hit the ground running.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No, this user page was created before the prod. Before the article itself, as a matter of fact. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 22:12, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * "22:09, 8 September 2009 Utah Patriot (talk | contribs) new user account". He's still a new user.  You initiated this MfD three minutes after "his" article was deleted as an expired prod.  I'd like for us to show more tolerance.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete User is on a spam campaign, a search reveals that he has spammed many other sites.  Triplestop  x3  02:46, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * If so, and if the user doesn't respond, then delete. WP:SPAM is a more serious problem than userspace WP:SOAP.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:57, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:UP-- SKATER  Speak. 13:54, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Take a hop off the soapbox. GrooveDog (oh hai.) 22:19, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.