Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:VMac73/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Keep (non-admin closure) 10Eleventeen 21:53, 15 May 2018 (UTC)

User:VMac73/sandbox


Abandoned draft. Notability is unlikely. 10Eleventeen 19:02, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is what CSD G13 is for. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:23, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm confused. Did you mean "speedy delete"? This page has been abandoned longer than that. It was last edited December 2018 before I tagged it. 10Eleventeen 19:26, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * No. You moved it to draftspace just now. It should sit another six months to allow interested editors to look at it, after which it will be automatically tagged for deletion. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 19:47, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * It's already had several years for interested editors to look at it. Several other pages in userspace were deleted under this criterion, without any trouble. 10Eleventeen 19:51, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Some admins delete pages under G13 that aren't eligible because they don't pay attention. It isn't the correct way to do it. Really, userpages that don't qualify for CSD U5 should simply be replaced with userpage blanked or its variant for inactive users. Draftspace isn't an indefinite holding ground, but bringing every benign, abandoned draft here is a massive waste of time for us voters. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 21:38, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.