Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Valoem/Laredo, Texas UFO crash

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 04:55, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

User:Valoem/Laredo, Texas UFO crash

 * Killiondude (talk) 03:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Killiondude (talk) 03:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

WP:STALEDRAFT. Originally was an article deleted from mainspace then userfied, but no activity or improvement after 2 years. Typically we give editors a long rope, but it's doubtful any new non-fringe reliable sources will arise that would justify a stand alone article. LuckyLouie (talk) 23:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep and close LuckyLouie has shown a bias against fringe related topics. I am allowed to retain such articles in my user space. Please close discussion and retain article. WP:NODEADLINE. Valoem talk contrib 18:31, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - This has sat in Valoem's userspace for a good 2 years and 3 days after Valoem's !vote it's still sat there - They have no interest in doing anything with it and I don't see why it should sit there for the next 5 years .... either you're going to improve it and move it back or you're not ... Valoem clearly isn't so deletion is our only option. – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 00:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Killiondude (talk) 03:20, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: I was tempted to suggest mainspacing and redirecting to the List of reported UFO sightings as I did with the Hopeh incident article, but the content and sourcing in this one is unacceptably poor and there would seem to be no hope of the content written here being used in improving either the list or in creating a standalone article. —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 16:10, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom, original deletion nom, and User:Davey2010. No need to keep indefinitely. --  P 1 9 9  ✉ 21:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.