Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Valoem/List of auteurs

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus, default to keep (WP:NOCONSENSUS). (non-admin closure) —  Godsy (TALK CONT ) 04:37, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

User:Valoem/List of auteurs

 * CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

The article was deleted at AFD in 2011 for being too subjective to ever be complete (see the discussion here). It was then restored and moved to Valoem's userspace in 2014 at their request. Since then, it has sat, largely untouched, since 2014. I doubt this will ever be encyclopedic, for just the reasons noted in the original AFD. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:42, 18 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Clearly allowed by point 3 of WP:UPYES. is an active and WP:HERE editor. There was a big brouhaha about stale drafts last year, and I think one of the things that most everyone agreed on during that debate was that deleting drafts from the userspace of active editors should only be done if the draft is truly problematic. The AfD you link was very close - it does not indicate to me that this could not possibly become an article. I see no reason that an active and HERE editor can't keep an article that was deleted after a very close AfD on the backburner in their userspace, clearly tagged as a draft, not bothering anyone at AfC or anything. It is unnecessarily intrusive to police such things - it has a great potential to stir up bad feelings and deletion provides essentially zero benefit to the project.  how would you feel if someone MfD'd User:PMC/SIS without consulting you (or even leaving a notice on your talk page) because they didn't feel it contributed to the development of Wikipedia? A2soup (talk) 00:55, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't bother me, given that I haven't edited it in something like a decade. In fact, I just nuked it myself, because it's clearly some old school assignment that doesn't contribute anything to the development of Wikipedia. If you go digging around and find any more, do let me know :) You're right though, my bad on not advising Valoem. I wrongly assumed that if the draft hadn't been touched then he probably wasn't here. I've left an apology on his talk page. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 01:37, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 20:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.