Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Vandal~enwiki

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:49, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

User:Vandal~enwiki


A user with the name Vandal would obviously be a vandal. There's no need for that blocked user notice. The past versions of the page are full of WP:NOTWEBHOST content, added by, a banned user, who's now blocked. And add to that, this userpage is full-protected. I don't think there is any need to keep the page at all. DL9C (talk) 08:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - I do not understand the purpose in attempting to whitewash the history of various vandals. BMK (talk) 00:21, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per BMK. This is a normal way of dealing with such users. Furthermore, there's no need to assume bad faith about someone with "vandal" in their username. They could be interested in the history of the Vandals or a fan of various entities listed at Vandal (disambiguation). I'm not saying it's a good idea for someone to do that, just that there's no reason to jump to such conclusions. --BDD (talk) 19:58, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.