Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:VanishedUser 23asdsalkaka/Partysandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Move to User:SmokeyJoe/Wikipedia governance reform has he has offered to rework it for future addition to a project page. — xaosflux  Talk 01:42, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

User:VanishedUser 23asdsalkaka/Partysandbox

 * Time stamp to re-sort for relisting. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Time stamp to re-sort for relisting. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Old userspace essay from an editor who requested to vanish. Note that the editor's name is inadvertently left here so to respect the vanish, we should delete it. The editor has either vanished and won't return so this isn't needed also or the editor could undo the vanish at which point they can request reinstatement if they want. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Valid user essay, indeed important and pertinent.  The philosophy of the essay also would oppose busybodies cleaning retired user's userspace.  Highlighting a vanished user's name, inadvertently left, on a high profile process page, was irresponsible.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:00, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
 * As contrasted to the busybodies that oppose active user's efforts to cleanup the irrelevant, problematic, promotional, and other useless or damaging garbage~left behind by those that are gone? Legacypac (talk) 23:40, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * No issue with cleaning up the promotional or damaging, but it is not all so. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:02, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The essay is in the userspace of the equivalent of say a blocked user, namely someone who isn't going to return under that name. If there's no indication that someone else supports the essay (or enough support to move it to Wikipedia space), how is keeping it anything but a WP:WEBHOST issue? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The subsequent standing of the author is irrelevant. The essay has project-related merit. NOTWEBHOST doesn't apply to project-related material. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:25, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 17:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Still Keep. Valid essay, clearly relevant to Wikipedia.  No has four explicit supporters, although I don't support every choice of word.  Move to ProjectSpace, as a valid, well-intentioned, multi-user supported project essay.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 14:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Move to Project space clearly this is an essay that resonates with some people. Brustopher (talk) 15:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Move to Project space but remove the vanished user's signature to respect their privacy. ~ RobTalk 21:47, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Actually, on looking at this again, this really should be gotten rid of. It explicitly encourages members to communicate and coordinate to "defend" certain tenants. That reeks of WP:CABAL behavior. At the very least, it violates WP:CANVASS. ~ RobTalk 17:53, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * - for a move closure, what new title do you suggest? — xaosflux  Talk 17:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * See my new !vote above. I didn't consider this fully enough before. ~ RobTalk 17:53, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:Wikipedia governance reform (mainstream rejection that there is any "governance" notwithstanding). Rob's concerns are fixable. If disagreed for ProjectSpace, please userfy for me.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * If you boldly fix the issues, I'll reconsider my vote above. Just ping me. ~ RobTalk 21:21, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.