Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Vaphualization




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. @harej 23:51, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

User:Vaphualization
The user in question is using his user page to host content relating to an indepth analysis of an article to which he is the only author. I don't really think that this should be hosted on Wikipedia, as it appears to be another method by which he hosts this possibly non-notable content.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 08:53, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, tag as userpage hosting material related to his editing interests is definitely allowed. The question would be whether this qualifies as a permanent home for an article unsuitable for inclusion, or POV fork.  Since you say he's the only editor of the real article, this form of self censorship (keeping the POV out of the article) doesn't sound all that bad.  I'm inclined to lean toward keeping this, as long as the userpage warning template is added so people are less likely to mistake it for an article.  Gigs (talk) 02:56, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and replace with, it is article improvement related so doing this allows the editor to access it if needed.--Otterathome (talk) 19:42, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It should not be hosted on wikipedia. copied from Shyamsunder (talk) 09:56, 30 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.