Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Vashtihorvat (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. Salvio Let's talk about it! 10:11, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

User:Vashtihorvat


See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Vashtihorvat - there was an expectation that the editor would work on this but there have been no edits since the MfD. Marquis and the International Bibliographical Center]] are not sufficient to show notability Dougweller (talk) 16:10, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - Actually, the expectation was that the user would contine making positive contributions to Wikipedia, not that page. The user has edited as recently as July 4.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 20:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep After the user trimmed the user page, apologized for her negligent edits, and pledged to become a contributor, she has fulfilled her pledge. In its current form, I don't believe the page violates User pages. However, the older forms contain promotional content that was userfied from Horvat, vashti. This content violated WP:NOTADVERTISING and WP:NOTWEBHOST. I understand Dougweller's expectation that would work on the content after userfication. However, she has now decided not to promote herself on Wikipedia by creating an autobiography. Given the circumstances, I would support a selective deletion of the old, promotional revisions of her user page that were once in the mainspace and a retention of the page in its current form. Cunard (talk) 06:36, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Actually, there was no expectation after that MfD that the user would work on that page; the only thing that I saw that was close to that was, saying "So long as the user continues to make at least vaguely positive contributions, I don't see any harm in keeping this." Am I right, or have I missed something?  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 18:47, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I referred not to an expectation after the MfD but to an implicit expectation after userfication. I am glad that the user has now ceased self promoting herself and instead contributed to the encyclopedia. I believe that the promotional content should not have been userfied. The promotional content in the history should be selectively deleted per WP:NOTADVERTISING. Cunard (talk) 01:51, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree I misread that. I presume if the decision is keep there will be no objection to the usual userspace & noindex templates? Dougweller (talk) 20:55, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I agree with adding the user page template to the user page to noindex the page from the search engines. Cunard (talk) 01:51, 5 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.