Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Vincy Viswanathan

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  23:48, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

User:Vincy Viswanathan

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

WP:FAKEARTICLE & WP:UP, as well as WP:AUTO, created by an account with no other contributions. CiaPan (talk) 18:04, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as a fake article by an editor who came, left this spam six years ago, and went away. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:27, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. A clear fake article. This is not what WP is for.--Bduke (talk) 05:14, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per my nom (forgot to add my vote when making this request). --CiaPan (talk) 08:49, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment to User:CiaPan - The nominator is always assumed to be !voting Delete unless they say something to the effect that they are making a procedural nomination.  Of course, the closer is not counting heads, but the closer is counting heads.  Robert McClenon (talk) 00:39, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the info. I seldom take part in discussions on deletions and almost never nominate anything, so I have little practice in this area and didn't know the rule. Feel free to delete or strike out my vote, or mark it some other way as redundant/unnecessary if you consider that appropriate. --CiaPan (talk) 09:04, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.