Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Vipul/Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  Blank. RL0919 (talk) 15:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

User:Vipul/Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

 * ‑Scottywong | talk _ 06:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * ‑Scottywong | talk _ 06:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

This has been lingering in 's userspace since 2013 and I still cannot find anything showing that this meets either WP:GNG or WP:NJournals. Time to pull the plug: Delete. Randykitty (talk) 12:47, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Question - Does User:Vipul have a comment? Robert McClenon (talk) 14:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep in the absence of a reason to delete. Lack of notability is not a reason to delete from draft or user space.  Robert McClenon (talk) 14:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * We don't allow users to keep unpublishable drafts in their user space forever. This has been around for more than six (6) years and there is still no indication that this ever could become a viable article. --Randykitty (talk) 14:40, 10 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Blank with inactive userpage blanked. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 18:40, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * is not inactive, so that template is not warranted (and it usually is applied to user and talk pages, not drafts in userspace. --Randykitty (talk) 21:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
 * It's frequently applied to userspace drafts as a result of MfDs, actually. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 23:52, 24 July 2019 (UTC)
 * If the user is not inactive, and the page is definitely with problems, use Userpage blanked. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:49, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I knew there was another version of the template I was thinking of, thanks Joe. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 22:53, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ‑Scottywong | talk _ 06:09, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. No reason to delete. Active editor, and at worst, old userpages are blanked, not deleted. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:40, 30 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.