Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Vnvnvn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Delete Tikiwont (talk) 15:58, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

User:Vnvnvn
The entire user page in question sounds like an excerpt from an essay. It clearly violates Wikipedia policy through the inclusion of blatant soapboxing. -- Lobbyist911 (talk) 04:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC) Anyway, we are in agreement about the userpage. –Black Falcon (Talk) 19:50, 12 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Nuke - WP:SOAP, WP:WEBHOST. Bleh. // roux   04:41, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not a webhost where you can place your polemical essays. Also the grammar used is appalling. Ironholds (talk) 10:38, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Mr. Obama, please delete this useless paranoid ranting attack page not related in any way to Wikipedia. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:39, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Rant. A quick review of this user's edit history reveals nothing productive, merely a disturbing bigotry against the Vietnamese. bd2412  T 00:06, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The user in question seems to be ranting not so much about Vietnamese people, but rather about Vietnamese communists and how they have infiltrated the internet. To be fair, it is indeed true at least some of the articles about Vietnam or related topics on the English Wikipedia have been infiltrated by Vietnamese communists, their sympathizers or other misguided people. The quality of such articles does also tend to be extremely poor and are rarely accessed. However, a rant on the user page without high-quality references is simply not acceptable. 83.233.168.90 (talk) 10:12, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wikipedia is not the appropriate forum to promote the Communist Party of Vietnam. Seriously, who wouldn't want to "hold on to power with their bloody monkey grip" and be "corrupted from the root to the top"? That sounds awesome! –Black Falcon (Talk) 18:41, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The rant doesn't promote the Vietnamese Communist Party or its members; it actually denounces them. Still, the user page in its current state is totally inappropriate. 84.159.121.169 (talk) 10:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I was being facetious. I guess I should have known better though, since "it's so easy to pick up on ... extratextual cues" in online media. Damn, I did it again! :)
 * Delete userpage and possibly oversight revisions elsewhere containing the same or almost identical material - Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Check the user's contribution history to see what he or she had been up to. 84.159.121.169 (talk) 10:33, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Oversight isn't needed; deletion hides all revisions from anyone who isn't an administrator anyway, and even if an administrator was that way politically orientated I doubt they'd find any use for this illegible screed. Ironholds (talk) 12:38, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails specifically WP:NOTSOAPBOX/1 & /2, from a non-serious contributor. Recommend that such things get blanked on sight.  No need for oversight.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:42, 13 February 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:SNOW Beeblebrox (talk) 18:58, 13 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.