Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WEFology2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 20:17, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

User:WEFology
Second MfD nomination, see Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WEFology for previous. It's been a couple of weeks and the user hasn't changed the user page and hasn't made any additional contributions, constructive or otherwise, to Wikipedia. This userpage is now just an advertisement masquerading as an article. Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 19:45, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above. John Carter 20:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:SPAM. I would have speedied the first time around. MER-C 02:54, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. The user actually created an article too which was speedied. I decided to MfD the first time around to not bite the newbies and since CSD usually refers to articles, not user pages. -Cquan (talk, AMA Desk) 16:01, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * CSD G11, as with the rest of the general criteria, applies to all pages. As for biting, I see biting spammers as beneficial for the encyclopedia. MER-C 03:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete spam. YechielMan 05:45, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam that has not changed one bit since the last MfD. -- WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  18:48, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as spam. --Core desat 05:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.