Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wabba The I/Robert Young

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. As a football fan, I am quite sure none of this is true. --BDD (talk) 17:06, 6 January 2015 (UTC)

User:Wabba The I/Robert Young


Stale userspace draft. Was never a part of Articles for Creation so I don't think G13 applies but WP:BLP could instead. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:46, 22 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment If I could see a BLP violation I might delete it as such, but I don't see anything negative there. It is an unsourced article. If what it says is true and verifiable then it may be the basis of an article. It has established notability but not verifiability. Robert Young shows multiple Bob and Robert Youngs involved with football, not sure if any of those are the same person. I am not giving an opinion on deletion until I have had a better look. Chillum 19:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, Young is not listed FIFA_Ballon_d%27Or or List_of_Liverpool_F.C._records_and_statistics so I suspect WP:HOAX is more appropriate. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:25, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.