Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wandalynnecrouch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete. Such pages are usually deleted 30 days after the user is blocked, but there really is no reason to bypass the delay in this case. - Rjd0060 (talk) 16:33, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

User:Wandalynnecrouch
This account has been indef-blocked as an attack account, whose only article was attacking someone of this name. Although the information here is not on the face of it offensive, it was inserted by someone who is no friend of the subject, and would be better removed. Maybe the talk page should go, too. -- JohnCD (talk) 22:22, 21 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete edits by a purely malicious account should go regardless of whether it violates policy. I think this is a case where WP:IAR applies. JuJube (talk) 10:56, 22 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - The page history still has a public disclosure of private facts. -- Suntag  ☼  04:19, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.