Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Washingtonlawyer

Closing instructions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep. You may rename the page if you wish. &mdash;harej (talk) (cool!) 22:02, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

User:Washingtonlawyer
This looks to me like an attempt to keep an article within wikipedia, about some non-notable subject. This kind of thing typically isn't allowed, I would be fine if an admin moved it to a subpage. —  Dæ dαlus Contribs  03:07, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Move to subpage. Looks like a newcomers first attempt at article creation.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:06, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep does not appear to be spam, nor anything more than a short essay permitted in Userspace. Collect (talk) 13:41, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Move to subpage. Agree with smokey, notability is not required in userspace, if it get's moved into article space, nominate again at AfD. GrooveDog (talk) (Review) 16:56, 11 July 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.