Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Way2Grow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was KEEP - Although the page has numerous issues, the user is extremely new and deserves time and offers of guidance/assistance. Furthermore, the nominator failed to notify the user, which combined with the newness of the user makes this extremely BITEY Doug.(talk • contribs) 01:11, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

User:Way2Grow
This userpage is only being used for advertising an organization. The page's creator has not edited any other pages. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Enviroboy TalkCs 01:25, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep this is a brand new editor sandboxing an article. We should not be jumping on deletion the moment we see these kinds of pages, but rather go to the user talk page and try to help them. From there we can see if there is any reasonable potential for notability. -- Ned Scott 06:56, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep for now...the page is very spammy, but as Ned said, it seems it's being used as a sandbox and not as an advertisement. At the moment, anyways, it's too soon to tell.  This is a good place to offer help, not slap on deletion tags (really, it's been less than a day) --UsaSatsui (talk) 06:59, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete on balance. I deleted it once as blatant advertising a few days ago & I think that is still my view.  I also concur with the point the nominator makes that there are no other contributions, something that always makes me look rather carefully. -- Herby  talk thyme 14:32, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep It's only the 2nd day for this editor. The organization is possibly notable, so he should be helped to write an acceptable article, not hindered in it. DGG (talk) 18:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Blank. Looks like advertising.  Keep available in case someone wants to build an article from it.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:27, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.