Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wheelchair Epidemic/Article Deletion Squadron

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn and no delete votes. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 23:42, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

User:Wheelchair Epidemic/Article Deletion Squadron


Article deletion is not supposed to be fun or a joke and this supposedly humorous essay has very little humour and is mostly a biased diatribe in favour of deletion. Atlantic306 (talk) 13:41, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep It's in user namespace. Editors are allowed to keep essays in their own subpages. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 13:49, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Question - Would we want to keep a diatribe in favor of keeping things? Robert McClenon (talk) 16:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * No we would want to delete a diatribe in favor of keeping things. It would be more ironic Legacypac (talk) 17:08, 24 October 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment - I will !vote within a few days. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:14, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm not in favor of keeping things, generally, but I recognize that policy requires a valid deletion rationale. The onus is on the nominator to provide a policy-based deletion rationale; they haven't. Atlantic306 has provided an IDONTLIKEIT argument to delete, not an article, but an essay in userspace. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 16:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep and publicize widely. That is very funny stuff. Legacypac (talk) 17:07, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete, salt, indef anyone who's laid eyes on it, and burn the server on which it was hosted for good measure. Humor is strictly prohibited on Wikipedia by Cabal decree; this is a serious encyclopedia for serious business and we are not to have so much as one single jot of amusement while we are about our grim task. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 18:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep If this were in Project namespace, then that might be a problem, but it is in user-space were more leeway exists for such type of content. –Ammarpad (talk) 19:28, 24 October 2018 (UTC)
 * OK, but it is linked from wikipediaspace here WP:Article Deletion Squadron, and has many links from userspace, regards Atlantic306 (talk) 12:19, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn can someone close this please Atlantic306 (talk) 18:31, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.