Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Whitney Crosse/Encaff Products Draft




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep (for now) - but if no improvement has been made within a few weeks, feel free to re-MfD it. It might be an idea to leave a message at User talk:Whitney Crosse giving advice on how to get this up to the required standard. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 02:38, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

User:Whitney Crosse/Encaff Products Draft
Blatant spam Orange Mike   &#x007C;   Talk  03:33, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

What about this page is "Blatant spam"? This is a reputable company I am in the process of making a valid Wikipedia entry for. It's not public yet because I am still in the process of gathering more references, but in no way do I see anything about this entry that could be considered spam. Thanks, Whitney Crosse (talk) 15:57, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep, for now It's not as 'blatant' as it needs to be, for my liking. Let the writer finish it, and when it reaches the Article namespace, then consider it for deletion if it's still considered Blatent Spam by someone. SmokingNewton (talk) 04:03, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Remove all external links. It is too promotional.  The Youtube and Facebook links will not be acceptable.  See External links.  The external links can be put in hidden text if User:Whitney Crosse really thinks they will be appropriate in the intended mainspace article.  Give the user more time.  However, this draft cannot stay in userspace for long without being testable at WP:AFD.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:50, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. This is a relatively new draft, just created a couple of weeks ago. Clearly too promotional and insufficiently sourced to survive in mainspace now, but it is acceptable to give the user a bit more time to work on it. --RL0919 (talk) 17:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Acceptable use of userspace, give the user some time. - Marcusmax  ( speak ) 02:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.