Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wikicology/Adopt

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte  (work  &#124; talk )   10:23, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Wikicology/Adopt


Wikicology has been banned by Arbcom indefinately from Wikipedia (see this). There are few pages created by this user still floating around. He was running a parallel "Wikipedia school". I am marking them for deletion on by one.  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  10:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)  Arun Kumar SINGH  (Talk)  10:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn by nominator as per suggestion of Rich Farmbrough here. Inconvenience regretted. Cheers,  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  08:37, 28 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. No deletion rationale advanced by the nominator.  User has a route back to editing in good standing.  This page contains history of interactions of significance, even if the user never returns.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:13, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - like I said before... -- PatientZero talk  15:43, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep per above - This is pathetic gravedancing at it's best! - We never delete userpages just because the editor's been banned .....and no actual valid reason has been presented for deletion, I never agree with blanking over deletion however SmokeyJoe's bang on and for once in my life I'll say Blank if needed. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:10, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.