Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wikiman232/Essjay


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Daniel Bryant  00:20, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

User:Wikiman232/Essjay
Disputed (or possibly deleted) early version of controversial article being maintained on user subpage. Propose deletion for the same reasons as the prior discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:QuackGuru. Please note - similar user subpages will be nominated separately. Risker 02:54, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per genuine concerns as expressed on the QuackGuru MfD regarding user space copies not being properly surveilled for WP:BLP vios. 03:32, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator. I was surprised to see that "deleted" tag already on the page. Concur with Netscott's assessment.  Risker 04:09, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, Netscott, and BLP concerns. - Denny 06:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - not forks, but a place to draft a better version of article ... for when a handful of editors including the nominating one and the ones who have voted so far quit dominating the article simply because they are the ones who can spend hours and hours each day at their computers. C.m.jones 06:40, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as both a content fork and a spin at skirting WP:BLP. Gwen Gale 10:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per BLP concerns. Metamagician3000 13:30, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep The reason I did this was because I was curious about the guy and I saw the article about him was going to be deleted so I decided to record it for posterity. Wikiman232 15:05, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Wikiman232's explanation above. Angus McLellan (Talk) 15:48, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per BLP concerns, article about non-notable individual superseded by article about the incident. .. dave souza, talk 22:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.