Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wikip rhyre/Systems architecture review board (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 12:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

User:Wikip rhyre/Systems architecture review board


Ok, I'm nominating this again for deletion. This is barely a draft and the questions here are complete WP:OR and not relevant. This draft started in October 2009, it was deleted in in November 2015, restored by request two weeks later and again seemingly abandoned after the addition of a reference I admit. I'm not seeing any indication that there is any actual interest in moving this to becoming even a stub and it looks like it's just here to be here for some reason. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - I'm not seeing any policy or guideline-based reason to delete in the nomination. What's more, per Google this appears to be a real thing, with at least some chance of being used to create an article someday. There could be a possible merge target at Software development process or a related page, though I haven't really found a good candidate yet. VQuakr (talk) 07:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Yes, looks like OR, but there are indications that the topic may be notable. User is active, the concerns should be brought up on its talk page. Previous deletion was very weak. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete its been deleted before and no effort to improve being made in 7 years. Legacypac (talk) 15:30, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * What is the guideline-based reasoning for deletion? This is not a vote. VQuakr (talk) 19:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
 * WP:COMMONSENSE Legacypac (talk) 00:13, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:UPYES (i.e. "What may I have in my user pages?": "[A] work in progress or material that you may come back to in future"), it was edited by the user whose space in which it resides less than 6 months ago. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 05:33, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. This isn't inherently unencyclopedic (although I doubt it's notable), and the editor has edited it recently. ~ RobTalk 22:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.