Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wildhartlivie/Sandbox

User:Wildhartlivie/Sandbox

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Deleted per U1. -  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 23:58, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Attack/wikistalking page that claims to be a precursor for an RFC, but has been up for over a month with no such action.
 * Keep - This page contains no names whatsoever except a listing of articles with dates attached to them and is clearly tagged as an RfC/U in progress with the template. There is nothing on that page that is attacking in anyway or supports a contention of wikistalking. This is filed in retaliation of a complaint I filed at WP:AN about a page created by the nominator that was created in a manner that attacked me and other editors and was speedily deleted. The nominator filed this deletion review four minutes after his page was deleted. Wildhartlivie (talk) 23:26, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * It was speedily deleted at my request. I just want the rules to be fairly applied to all editors; I don't think that's too unreasonable, but if you want to call it "retaliation", fine.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  01:29, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Let's also note that while the page was deleted upon what was noted as user request, it wasn't done before you transferred all the links on that page to a new user subpage here, so it surreptiously was retained before having the attack page deleted. The only way I can interpret this is retaliatory. That the links were transferred to another subpage also reflects an intention to recreate the page. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * There's nothing wrong with keeping a collection of links. I won't be expanding the page beyond that.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  01:52, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - This page is about me. WHL has had this page in one form or another since December and moved it to where it is now in mid-January.  Since that time, she has done nothing with the information and only yesterday placed the tag on it indicating her plans on how she says she is going to use it.  Prior to yesterday, it was nothing more than a "serious injury list" (ala Rainman).  She's had enough time to do something with this information and has only acted as if she is going to use it for something more than it has been since yesterday when other editors commented on it.  Additionally, she had been told to not post comments about me in WP, yet, she kept this page up (with my username and other various information about me) in direct violation of that directive.  Even if this page wasn't about me, I would still feel that it should be deleted. I can't see any good reason for her to keep it this long on WP - it can be kept on her home computer where it will not be viewed by anyone here.  --SkagitRiverQueen (talk) 23:44, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * What is no longer posted on the page is completely irrelevant. There are no editor's names on that page or diffs to posts the editor made and when the template was placed on it, by suggestion, is also irrelevant. Keeping this page violates no restrictions whatsoever. The comment about a serious injury list was a direct comment I made on a MfD page that the above poster kept and was subsequently deleted. There are no "serious injuries" on that page whatsoever. Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:00, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Of course the history is relevant. Anyone can look at the history.&mdash; Chowbok  ☠  01:27, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Try touting that to WP:BLP, which your page violated. Mine does not. Wildhartlivie (talk) 01:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.