Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WindowsNT4.0

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete all. Should the user return, request to have their username changed and be unblocked, any admin (not just myself) is free to undelete these pages at the author's request. I will leave a note on the user's talk page shortly after this closure. — ξ xplicit  01:09, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

User:WindowsNT4.0
User has stopped editing since 10 July 2010. It is apparent from the mainly userspace edits that this editor will not likely return to contribute to the encyclopedia. I am also nominating: which does not seem an appropriate template, as it only points to a specific user. If he returns, which I highly doubt, he can always request undeletion; otherwise this will perpetually stay as webhosting content. :| TelCo NaSp  Ve :|  03:34, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * User:WindowsNT4.0/menu
 * User:WindowsNT4.0/Sandbox
 * User:WindowsNT4.0/Desk
 * User:WindowsNT4.0/Workstation
 * User:WindowsNT4.0/ExperiencePage
 * User:WindowsNT4.0/Archive2/UserPage2
 * User:WindowsNT4.0/Archive2 and associated talkpage
 * Template:User: WindowsNT4.0/talk


 * Delete Per nom, essentially. The user doesn't look like they would come back and contribute.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 18:32, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep – July 2010 was only two months ago. If we're going to delete userpages of users who have left for some time, we should wait at least half a year to make sure that their inactivity stays. Nomader  ( Talk ) 04:26, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Per Cunard and the nominator, I am changing to Delete all with the caveat that if the user ever comes back, he can request undeletion at any time and uncontroversially have his requests completed. Nomader  ( Talk ) 14:53, 18 September 2010 (UTC)


 * I agree with the sentiments expressed by . Pages of this nature should generally be deleted only after six months have passed. I have reviewed the pages and do not believe they violate any policies or guidelines. However, the user is blocked indefinitely for a username violation so deleting the pages is uncontroversial housekeeping. The user may return and request username change and an unblock, though. If the user is unblocked, I recommend undeleting these pages which do not violate any policies or guidelines upon the user's request for undeletion. I ask the closing admin to notify the user of his/her options after this MfD is closed. Cunard (talk) 20:51, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.