Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WoodyNelson

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_ Zero 16:34, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

User:WoodyNelson
Creation of this somewhat spammy user page was this users first edit, nearly four years ago. They made two more edits two months ago that were the creation of a page that was also spam and a copyvio. For some reason this seems to attract the occasional vandalism, including apparent BLP violations. Anyway, the main reason for deletion is that this is self-promotion that has sat here for nearly four years. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:02, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Should be blanked or severely cut back on sight, regardless of age. The inclusion of external links on the userpage of a user with no surviving edits is not OK.  No need to create an MfD over such pages.  The user rarely comes to revert, and if they do, it is a chance to engage a lurking potential editor.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:50, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Klein zach  00:22, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. --E♴ (talk) 01:48, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 09:26, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nominator says it best. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 17:43, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 09:16, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.