Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Worldaz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was kept userpage, rest deleted. &mdash; Werdna talk 11:53, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

User:Worldaz

 * – copy of Office of Film and Literature Classification (Australia); see User page
 * – sub-stub with essentially no informative content
 * – a disambiguation page pointing to two pages in userspace
 * – a special version of Boxville
 * – a description of a bus, with a list of locations
 * – essentially a description of a double-decker bus
 * – a list of redlinks
 * – a "pony"?
 * – a list of redlinks
 * – a "pony"?

The pages listed above are in the userspace of a user who edited for a few days in January. The user has not edited in over four months and, based on this edit, I would conclude that s/he has left the project. The pages listed above seem to be an attempt to create a detailed directory of vehicles that appear in the GTA series. However, none of the vehicles are individually notable, and a list of vehicles in GTA would probably be deleted under a combination of WP:PLOT, WP:NOT, and WP:NOT. (For what it's worth, a List of vehicles in Grand Theft Auto series exists at the GTA wiki.) Delete all as having no use to the project. –Black Falcon (Talk) 19:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Apparently, a list of vehicles in the Grand Theft Auto series has already been deleted (see AFD). –Black Falcon (Talk) 19:37, 26 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete all - Not useful to project, inactive user. VegaDark (talk) 21:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep  all  main user page Blank if anyone is worried about Google indexing. I see no reason to delete any of these, and sandboxes don't have time limits. An editor becoming active on a Wikia wiki doesn't indicate they left the project, as many of us, such as myself, are active on both sites. -- Ned Scott 05:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * These aren't just sandboxes for testing or article development. The content has already been deleted once (well, thrice actually - once per the AfD and twice per CSD G4) and there is really no conceivable it could or should be reintroduced into the mainspace. –Black Falcon (Talk) 05:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * While I still don't think total deletion is necessary, I can't ignore your point that it would be reallllly unlikely for the GTA articles to reach the main article space again. -- Ned Scott 05:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I did some more investigation of the editor's contributions and wasn't able to find any definitive confirmation of his/her departure. I can see your point regarding the possibility of the editor's return and the potential merit of not deleting the main user page. –Black Falcon (Talk) 05:41, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete all except user page. Deleting sandboxes with content that is not going to make it into the mainspace is one thing, deleting the user page unless there is a really good reason is a bit too WP:BITEy for me. He might return one day. --Enric Naval (talk) 17:04, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep user page, delete subpages, per Enric Naval. DigitalC (talk) 06:27, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep userpage and "Newsvan" subpage That one looks like a sandbox right now. Delete the rest as misuse of userspace. Ultra! 11:10, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.