Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Worldreporter2000

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Move to user subpage. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 15:33, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

User:Worldreporter2000


WP:FAKEARTICLE on a userpage Legacypac (talk) 03:29, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Not an unreasonable draft. Move to a subpage and consider blanking at worst.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * AFAIK, user-pages are not stale.It also does not meet U5 and/or G3 as a verifiable potential article with borderline notability.But G11 could become a factor, after expense of such a long time.So, move to user-sub-page and weak keep is my call. Winged Blades Godric 07:14, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly a WP:RESUME. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I hadn't read it that way, but I can see that one can. I think it is a harsh response.  It dates similarly to Global Thinkers Forum, and it is interesting to see how that author improved that draft article with a little help.


 * Reem N. Bsaiso is plausibly notable. Not clearly notable.  The draft would require complete rewriting with better sources.  I not no BLP "concenrs", and recommend Inactive userpage blanked.  "Delete" is not unreasonable.  It is probably the same as the deleted draft that anyone may get REFUNDed.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:39, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.