Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Worldwide Actors/Josiah Mizukami

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT #1 (no reason for deletion presented in nomination). (non-admin closure) VQuakr (talk) 20:40, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

User:Worldwide Actors/Josiah Mizukami


Non-notable actor bio bty single purpose acct. abandoned Legacypac (talk) 03:32, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy close per WP:NMFD. Claims check out, not obviously non-notable.  WP:SPA and abandoned are not deletion reasons.  An alternative action, designed for this sort of thing, is Inactive userpage blanked.  Another alternative is for AfC to develop their own process.  WP:NMFD happened for a reason.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:44, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * NMFD is not even policy. Legacypac (talk) 04:03, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The policy is WP:Consensus, with the discussion and result being here: Wikipedia_talk:Notability/Archive_58 (unanimous except for you). The underlying reason is that evaluating WP:N, which means examining all sources that exist, not just those in the article, is beyond the scope of MfD.  Also note the previous futility and failure of entertaining notability questions at the WP:N/N.  No, notability is just a guideline informing and reflecting practice at WP:AfD, and only WP:AfD is competent to decide questions of notability.  If you want to delete someone's userpages like this, you need to justify it along the lines of reasons at WP:UPNOT or WP:NOT.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:32, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Faulty question and faulty close that ignores all the time based qualificatons to the votes. Now, does this page have a chance of becoming an article or is it a webhost violation by a noncontributor? Legacypac (talk) 04:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * "Faulty question and faulty close"? I didn't participate in that RfC, so I dare say it is fair of me to say that you are are dreaming.  A well participated RfC raised directly due to your MfD nominations, where everybody disagrees with you.  All the "but"s were along the lines that "notability" is irrelevant but there are other reasons to delete most of the stuff you nominate under a notability based rationale.  Namely, things described at WP:UPNOT and WP:NOT.
 * "is it a webhost violation by a noncontributor?" Do you want to improve your nomination statement?  It is certainly an old page, 2012.  It contains reasonable claims with links but many are broken.  One could check webarchives.  I recommend Inactive userpage blanked.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:34, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.