Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Wranglers 04


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. —Doug Bell talk 20:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

User:Wranglers 04
User has not made any enduring contributions under this name since it was created in May, 2006. Space is currently being used as a message board by various anons. ... disco spinster   talk  19:33, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per WP:NOT. -/- Warren 21:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * A message from The Wranglers_04: Listen Discospinster, this is my userpage and you have absolutely no right to delete this page. I have continued to add on to this page and am a contributing member to the Wikipedia community though I am not logged in as Wranglers_04. My fellow message boarders added a few lines to my site as a joke for a couple of days, if you have a problem with it-- Don't read it. It's as simple as that. Once again, this is my userpage, you have no right to sit on your high chair acting like some sort of dictator.. For the most part it's a private page and not part of the Wikipedia universe, back off low lifes. You don't see me trying to snoop on your pages and tagging it like little girls. -Wranglers_04
 * Comment. Actually, it's not your userpage.  Please see WP:USER. ...  disco spinster   talk  22:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Wranglers_04- Don't give me some link to a B.S site. Last year I had a "Wranglers_04" site on Wikipedia.. I worked something out with another mod and he agreed to add it to my userpage. Okay, what part of that doesn't translate to you? It doesn't matter whether I edit sites while logged in as Wranglers_04 or if I don't. Please, get head out of your butt and move on. Stop letting your friggin' ego get in your head.
 * Mr.Discospinster, you have no life don't you? is this all you do, sit there and report people, you have a sad sad life. -AFL message board poster


 * Weak Delete - I can't see no evidence of the user page being used as a message board, but I can't see it ever being able to be placed in article namespace or it complying with WP:USER. --tgheretford (talk) 22:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I edit all the time on Wikipedia.. why does it make a difference what so ever if I'm logged on while I do it. Compare my IP with the IP of the user who's written practically all of the Austin Wranglers wiki site. Do you think I'm lying? For the love of God, stop hijacking my page. I contribute all the time, and your not going to tell me I have to be "logged on" to do so. End of story. -W_04


 * Delete. Blatant advertising. - Mgm|(talk) 09:44, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. W 04's page is advertising.  S .D.   ¿п?  § 12:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is neither being used as a message board or is an advertisement, it is an article on a user of various football message boards. Wranglers 04 was removed from the mainspace following this discussion and decision was made to userfy it as per notability concerns. If you have a problem with the decision, please refer it to deletion review, not MfD.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   13:50, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Userpages are not meant to be dumping grounds for inappropriate articles.  The user has not actually made any edits in Wikipedia since the account was created in May-06, so what does s/he need a userpage for?  The article shouldn't be restored, so there's no need for a deletion review.  I believe that MfD is the place to go. ...  disco spinster   talk  14:35, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Yes, unless in exceptions of autobiographies which are often moved from the mainspace. I think it's inappropriate to consider inactivity of the user as a ground for deletion, especially since he wasn't the original creator of the userpage. The deletion review exists to overturn closing decisions and not necessarily to provide undeletions.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   16:30, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I've opened a discussion on similar issues in the village pump, please comment about it there.  Michaelas10   (Talk)   11:20, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Strongest Possible DELETE This user is using his user space completely contrary to WP:USER. And on top of it he is engaging in conduct here that is blatantly in violation of WP:NPA and WP:CIVIL. I say delte the user space content and indfinately block the user. Jerry lavoie 00:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

-- Advertising? In no way, 100% was that article meant "advertise" the AFL boards, rather it was to express some of this Wikipedia editor's honest to God interests. Why would I advertise for a board by telling about my own accounts on some userpage lost in the world of Wikipedia cyberspace? The only folks who really can read this is those I give a link to.

Please, act like a human without all of this Wikipedia vocabulary moderator gibberish, realize, in the whole spectrum of things, is it really going to matter? Is some average Wikipedia user going to somehow find my userpage and be offended? I think not. Whether or not I edit under my username Wranglers_04 is my personal business, and I fully intend to continue editing under my IP and my IP alone.

Besides, matters of this manner was already discussed in the May of 2006. This page was previously under Wikipedia's mainspace before it was agreed upon to move to my userpage.

On top of this, if your really deleting people's own userpage for non-participation, why are you picking on me.. There are probably MILLIONS upon MILLIONS of userpages in the cyberspace of wikipedia that lack contribution to wikipedia. If you're going to call me out, you sure as heck better call out EVERYONE else who hasn't met your standards for participation.

BTW, if you call that article "inappropriate".. wow, have you ever been to any site other than Wikipedia?

-W_04 ---


 * Kill the squatters, and salt it if they try to come back. Wikipedia is not a place to loiter around in cyberspace. I would advise the distraught user to familiarize themselves with our policies about what wikipedia is not and what a userpage can be used for. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 19:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt WP:NOT a message board. JChap2007 20:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:USER. CiaranG 21:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly against policy; the only question is whether it is serious enough, which I now believe it is. He's not using this page to facilitate his work on the encyclopedia, and that's a good place to draw the line. His comments above don't help his case either.  EdJohnston 01:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and then fight to the death. − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 05:51, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Well, you've all made the point of WP:USER. I can only agree ;-) Happy Editing by  Snowolf (talk) on  22:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Guys, get over yourselves.. How about instead of using your "I'm better than you" Wikipdeia terminology, you SUGGEST a guy something.. Fine, I'll add a section to spare me from the guillotine of Wikipedia for a second deletion. And before you wonder, yes, it'll be a B.S one sentencer.. First you make up it should be deleted because I don't "particpate" enough on wikipedia, then you go on about this..

Fight the man.

-Wranglers_04
 * keep Ok guys, just because you dont like it, doesnt mean its bad. Give the guy a break. There is NO advertising here. Strong, strong keepl! (rallybird) --GBVrallyCI 15:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

--Wranglers_04
 * keep That's what I'm talking about Rallybird! I didn't know decent, human beings existed on this site.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.