Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:XxDalekcaanxx/sandbox (2nd nomination)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:47, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

User:XxDalekcaanxx/sandbox


NOTE: page being nominated is here; I can't get this template to work properly.

Persistent attempt at web-hosting the user's non-notable band. Previously speedied at B Yellow; earlier MfD here. Hairhorn (talk) 19:23, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Fixed. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:49, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * - This sandbox was nominated in 2016 (Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:XxDalekcaanxx/sandbox) which is why you could've had issues ?, Anyway delete per NOTWEBHOST. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:52, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for fixing, I followed the instructions for second nominations, perhaps the issue is early senility... Hairhorn (talk) 20:02, 17 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Follow WP:STALE: i.e., if deletion is truly desired, move to Draft:B Yellow which will likely make this eligible for G13 in six months; or, better yet, simply quickly solve this by blanking with Inactive userpage blanked. If that is followed, then we will likely never have to discuss this here again. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 21:22, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete with prejudice. This band is beyond WP:YAMB, but well short of WP:BAND.  It needs a clear deletion decision, not blanking, because it is unsuitably sourced promotion, it has been deleted before (MFD1; my !vote there remains the same), and because a WP:COI WP:SPA account,  has been pushing it on Wikipedia for five years.  Wikipedia is not for advertising your band, it is not suitable until it has received multiple instances of independent coverage discussing the band in depth.  In the meantime, use you website, use facebook, etc, but not Wikipedia.  The page is G11 worthy (promotion without any suitable sources), but the author needs a formal warning.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:05, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Either G4 or G11 would be in order. It would have been easier to go the speedy route.  Action against the author can be taken via COIN.  However, since we are here:
 * Delete Robert McClenon (talk) 01:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - I've taken this to WP:COIN. COIN doesn't always do very well with drafts, but if you want action against an author, COIN is better than MFD.  Robert McClenon (talk) 01:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete. User blocked as not being here to improve Wikipedia. MER-C 07:59, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.