Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Yahel Guhan




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. @harej 20:27, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

User:Yahel Guhan
As per WP:UP 9 and 10. While I respect a user's right to state why they have retired, they should do so in a manner that is respectful and non-disruptive. Rather serious accusations are leveled against unspecified editors and admins, without any evidence etc. In my opinion, this type of speech contributes nothing to improving the encyclopedia.

Perhaps blanking rather than deletion is warranted, but after all these years I have no idea how to request a blanking for a page not mine ;) Cerejota (talk) 17:01, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - no personal attacks, incisive commentary on what is broken here. → ROUX   ₪  20:18, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. A justifiable leaving statement in the appropriate place.  No evidence provide to substantiate the allegation that this page is disruptive.  The value of this page relates to Editors matter.  We shouldn't censor this sort of burnt wikipedian feedback because we don't like it.  Blanking is not requested, but done according to WP:BRD.  I oppose the blanking of this page.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:45, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per Roux and SmokeyJoe. — Malik Shabazz 01:36, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Unfortunately allot of his comments are still true to this day :(  and they may help us learn to be better. RP459 (talk) 03:58, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep There's not enough context here to attach these comments to any particular editor. Gigs (talk) 17:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Some of his words are true... Besides that there was nothing to single out a specific editor rather most of us as a whole.-- SKATER  Speak. 19:04, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep No justification for deleting his feedback, even if it is critical Little Professor (talk) 20:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep He's in my opinion  wrong throughout, but within a reasonable right to express oneself.  It's time we stopped trying to remove comments critical of our processes.  DGG ( talk ) 22:08, 17 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.