Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Yezidi Human Rights Organizations

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 08:17, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

User:Yezidi Human Rights Organizations
This is a short pseudo article in place of a user page. It has not been worked on in any meaningful way for months and its author is blocked indefinitely. It is very unlikely to ever be of any use to the project. DanielRigal (talk) 11:27, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Hardly surprising it isn't being edited, if the main editor is blocked. I don't know enough about the block to know whether it can be successfully appealed. I'd prefer to wait six months after editor returns (with no further activity), or, if they never return, go at least a year until removal. -- SPhilbrick  T  13:17, 22 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete I doubt that the block will be lifted. WP:FAKEARTICLE.  Hi 8 7 8   (Come shout at me!) 03:51, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, WP:ARTICLESPAM.  elektrik SHOOS (editing from a public terminal) 14:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE, which states "While userpages and subpages can be used as a development ground for generating new content, this space is not intended to indefinitely archive your preferred version of disputed or previously deleted content or indefinitely archive permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a free web host and private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion" (mine emphasized). Because this page violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 05:41, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Even if the contributor were not blocked, WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST would still be applicable. Cunard (talk) 05:41, 24 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE; not helpful. Johnuniq (talk) 07:25, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as the only block reason was the name. No behavioural issues, so the block, per se, is insufficient for deletion. Collect (talk) 15:18, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Hosting a webpage for an SPA violates WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST. Because this page violates a guideline and a policy, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 02:33, 30 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.