Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Yordiekidane

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 00:01, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Yordiekidane


Glowing promo piece built in userspace by a Single Purpose Account. Notawebhost applies as well as FakeArticle. Legacypac (talk) 23:14, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Merge to Talk:Robin Wight and collapse, noting that it is the contribution of a connected person.  The creation of this userpage is in line with instructions given by the closer of Articles for deletion/Engine group.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Nothing in that page is referenced by any reliable sources, and since it is the product of a severe COI, we can't assume any of it is legitimate information. All together that makes it completely useless for a merge - we'd have to research and re-reference anything we imported, so we might as well skip the merge and just track down refs if we want to expand the article. The instructions in that 10-year-old AfD clearly state that the creator should check with experienced users to assess the suitability for article space. Checking the contribs for the creator makes it clear that this was never done in the case of this page, so in fact, the creator's actions are not in line with that AfD. Honestly, SmokeyJoe, I'm surprised. While I sometimes disagree with your opinions on an MfD, I've never found myself questioning your logic like this. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 10:23, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * COI persons, "severe" or not, are encouraged to post concerns or information on the article talk page. "Merge to the talk page" is showing them what they should have done, should do, per WP:COI. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * What are you basing the "severe COI on? How is User:Yordiekidane connected to Robin Wight or Engine Group. Looking over the histories of the two articles, I find myself confused. Is Robin Wight supposed to be deleted? Its talk page says so, but not the main page. Last point: the article in contention is not on a draft page, it's directly in a user's page. Isn't that an issue? And it's been four years between edits. If Robin Wight didn't exist, I would say move User:Yordiekidane in accordance with Abandon Drafts.


 * Move to Abandon Articles; Delete Robin Wight as was determined ten years ago. — Myk Streja [ citation needed ] 23:31, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * "Severe COI". You can tell from the content. User:Yordiekidane Is Robin Wight. Or his mother. Or his personal biographer. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:39, 11 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.