Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Your suraj/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Partial Keep. Draft:City Express Money Transfer was deleted per author's preference. However, as noted, City Express Money Transfer appears to be a notable organization. Thus, User:Your suraj/sandbox was preserved for future development. I will notify author that they are free to resume work on the article. Thank you all for your participation! (non-admin closure) &#8213; Matthew J. Long -Talk-☖  01:17, 19 February 2019 (UTC)

User:Your suraj/sandbox


Editor submitting multiple copies of a non notable company, has also made a mainspace version which was speedy deleted under A7 and G11. Draft was rejected by another reviewer. CoolSkittle (talk) 18:06, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * WP:BITE. Someone needs to point the author to WP:CORP before bringing WP:CORP failures to mfd. A7 is not relevant to drafts. If G11 applied, apply it again, unless it is a different draft in which case the past G11 is not relevant. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:17, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I think that deletion nominations citing the WP:DMFD-enabling criteria "repeatedly resubmitted and declined at AfC without any substantial improvement" should provide diffs. There are too many nominations where this is alluded to inaccurately.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:11, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Nom does not make that claim. There are in fact more than one copy. So

Got this message: Dear Legacypac, Yes! there are two same articles; one is in my sandbox and another is in draft. I have done everything for this article. I do not have COI issues and I have provided more than enough references. Please kindly trust me that this subject of mine is very notable in Nepal. It falls under the top three remittance companies. Your suraj (talk) 07:20, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as not passing WP:NCORP Legacypac (talk) 03:13, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

Do you want to develop the sandbox or draft? CoolSkittle (talk) 10:25, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I had a suspicion that this company is widely known in Nepal-likely a branch or agency in every town. Legacypac (talk) 07:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - Waiting for 48 hours to know which copy needs deleting. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:13, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * The sandbox can just be cleared. I might work on this page. Seems notable. Legacypac (talk) 04:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Author has left me a message on my talk page: "Dear CoolSkittle, You can delete any one. Please keep the one which has the potential to get approved sooner. Thank you. Your suraj (talk) 05:00, 15 February 2019 (UTC)" CoolSkittle  (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep per Legacypac's points. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 17:36, 16 February 2019 (UTC)

Dear Legacypac, CoolSkittle, Rubbish computer, SmokeyJoe, Bkissin Please keep my article. I have played by the rules of wikipedia. Please delete the draft and keep the sandbox. Your suraj (talk) 03:32, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.