Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Youreallycan/editnotice.js

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. Being banned is not sufficient reason to ragpick innocuous junk (non-admin closure) Dronebogus (talk) 21:22, 4 December 2022 (UTC)

User:Youreallycan/editnotice.js

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;
 * North America1000 10:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Unused template of no use to anyone other than the creator who has been banned since 2013. Found due to Tidy font bug error in signature. Zinnober9 (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:06, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Transcluded at User talk:Youreallycan/Editnotice, which in turn shows up when editing User talk:Youreallycan. Deleting things in people's userspace solely due to user status should be reserved for sockpuppets, not mere banned users. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:44, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep as it's used on the creator's talk page. The user being blocked isn't enough of reason to delete content in their userspace unless it's harmful. Glades12 (talk) 15:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. We should not generally be policing userspace at all. If a user wants to say foolish things or create their own tools, a certain amount of leeway is desirable. BusterD (talk) 14:59, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.