Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:YousefAB/Engineers United

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:22, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

User:YousefAB/Engineers United
Stale 11 month old draft of an A7ed article. No indication that this initiative has a chance in hell of making notability in mainspace. Gigs (talk) 15:22, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Because this page violates WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 23:03, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, abandoned WP:FAKEARTICLE. No edits to this page or by this user since January, this is the user's only live edit. MER-C 01:54, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Use the WP:STALEDRAFT shortcut in cases like this please. Gigs (talk) 03:27, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as an abandoned WP:FAKEARTICLE. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 12:39, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Please? Gigs (talk) 04:54, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with 's comment at the RfD: "a page which is like an article but is kept indefinitely in user space can reasonably be referred to as a "fake article", whether or not the intention was fraudulent". User:YousefAB/Engineers United looks like an article but is not one. Therefore, it is a fake article. I will use WP:STALEDRAFT more but do not see how using WP:FAKEARTICLE is factually inacccurate. Cunard (talk) 05:41, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with Gigs. "Fake" is bitey.  It implies bad faith.  It implies false information, or at least a false assertion of notability.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:46, 27 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.