Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Yung dre 59/DJ Yung Dre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was delete all--Aervanath (talk) 16:03, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

User:Yung dre 59/DJ Yung Dre

 * User:Yung dre 59/DJ Yung Dre
 * User:Yung dre 59/Yung Dre Music Ent.
 * User:Yung dre 59/Northside Cash Money Entertainment
 * User:Yung dre 59/Template:Yung Dre
 * User:Yung dre 59/Fresh White Tee
 * User:Yung dre 59/Echo
 * User:Yung dre 59/Northcliffe Manor EP
 * User:Yung dre 59/Going Crazy
 * User:Yung dre 59/Going My Way EP
 * User:Yung dre 59/Going My Way
 * User:Yung dre 59/Lil Kadrick
 * User:Yung dre 59/Think of Me
 * User:Yung dre 59/Maribel
 * User:Yung dre 59/Ain't Youth Great

Series of autobio and self-serving articles. Wikipedia is not free webspace to promote you or musical endeavors. -- TheJazzDalek (talk) 19:12, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all per WP:WEBHOST. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 21:44, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Refer user to Alternative outlets. Give him time to move it.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:47, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete all per WP:NOSHITSHERLOCK (there really should be one o_o) JuJube (talk) 16:03, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep pending clarification by the user as to the purpose of these pages: does he intend that they should eventually be moved into the mainspace? If he does not, then definitely delete. The user seems to be a constructive contributor and has made in excess of 2,000 edits, over 70% of which are to articles. Such an editor should, in my opinion, be given a chance to explain the purpose of seemingly questionable pages in his userspace before they are deleted; in other words, this is not necessarily a completely clear case of using Wikipedia as a personal webhost. –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 02:20, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * He's making articles for his, his sister's, and other related music projects, all clearly non-notable. Certainly he is a net asset to Wikipedia but that doesn't mean that normal rules don't apply to him. TheJazzDalek (talk) 08:57, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I would prefer for the question of notability to be considered at AfD rather than prejudged at MfD since the mindset of discussion participants is often quite different across deletion discussion venues, which is why I would like to know whether he intends for this information to serve as the basis of one or more articles; if he does not (or if he does not offer clarification on this point), then I would support deletion of the pages—with the condition that they be made available to him at request to keep as a hard copy or move to another website. –B LACK F ALCON  (T ALK ) 20:28, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I wouldn't usually advocate the deletion of somebody's personal userpages but this is really pushing it in to becoming a personal web space for the author. Wikipedia is not your personal web host! JulieSpaulding (talk) 03:07, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.