Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ZLEA/Anti-Vandalism Corps

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete, user agreed. NAC. &mdash; Train2104 (t • c) 16:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

User:ZLEA/Anti-Vandalism Corps


One users' own WP:CVU clone, with the twist that the member's are "soldiers" and they are their "director" with the ability to promote and demote their soldiers. This is contrary to the spirit of how Wikipedia works and encourages an unhealthy militaristic mindset when dealing with new users and new pages. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep I had no idea that a "militaristic mindset when dealing with new users and new pages" was wrong, so I will do my best to make sure this doesn't happen again (I got rid of it in AVC too). But, if there is a problem with AVC being a "clone" of CVU, than I will understand why it was deleted. -  ZLEA  ( Talk, Contribs ) 22:38, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The problem is that you have created a project in your userspace that is apparently run according to you rules, when we already have a perfectly good project that does the same thing and is run by consnesus as it should be. A lot of people have worked for a very long time to build CVU and make sure it works properly and doesn't encourage it's particpants to assume bad faith. This project looks like basically the opposite of that. I can't see what possible purpose it could serve and believe its very structure is antithetical to the Wikipedia ethos. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I'd never encourage to assume bad faith, I strongly agree in assuming good faith. - ZLEA  ( Talk, Contribs ) 13:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete But I do see your other point. - ZLEA  ( Talk, Contribs ) 13:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy delete - Way too aggressive for this project. - Mlpearc  ( open channel ) 23:13, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.