Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Zappaz/scrapbook/Controversy surrounding new religious movements and their critics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete per WP:CSD. If the user returns, I can always restore them. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 16:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

User:Zappaz/scrapbook/Controversy surrounding new religious movements and their critics
Housekeeping. This is in the user space of an editor that has not edited since January 2006 and this page has not been touched since December 2004. Justallofthem (talk) 16:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Obsolete work-in-progress page, with no further progress ever likely to be made since the user has apparently left. Terraxos (talk) 00:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep and blank no reason to actually delete the page. -- Ned Scott 05:06, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Abandoned userfication, no progress made in 2 years. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:00, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Userfied from where? Was it once deleted?  If so, delete, otherwise keep or blank.  There are no time limits.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:13, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep & Blank - abandoned, but the user may return at some point. DigitalC (talk) 07:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Inactive user, if they come back they can ask an admin to bring the page back from the dead. MrMarkTaylor What's that?/What I Do/Feed My Box 19:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.