Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Zouxiaohui


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was keep –Juliancolton Tropical  Cyclone  23:55, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

User:Zouxiaohui
non-encyclopedic, personal opinions on matters unrelated to Wikipedia -- Wcam (talk) 15:50, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep (possibly speedily) - harmless information about the editor's interests which may assist in encyclopedia collaboration. – xeno  ( talk ) 15:53, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - user pages are expected to be non encyclopedic. The opinions are harmless. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - According WP:UP, "4. Extensive personal opinions on matters unrelated to Wikipedia, wiki philosophy, collaboration, free content, the Creative Commons, etc." and "7. Extensive self-promotional material that is unrelated to your activities as a Wikipedian", I support to delete it. Moreover, the Chinese version in zh.Wikipedia has been raised to Article for deletion, and the result was "delete". You may take it for reference.-- J.W  ong  03:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep (assuming that the Chinese material is innocuous, of course) The material is not "extensive" (c.v.s and the like are allowed as long as they are not several pages long -- this does not reach that limit by a long shot).  Actions taken by any other site are not pertinent to a deletion discussion -- this page stands or falls based on WP rules for MfD.  Collect (talk) 12:08, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Harmless user page. —macy 04:27, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Not only has the editor cut out most of the content on this page since the nomination came out, I don't even understand what the problem was in the first place. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. The editor has changed the user page to a harmless version. Malinaccier (talk) 19:14, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.