Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:"Jaipremram"

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  withdrawn. See below. (non-admin closure) Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:54, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

User talk:"Jaipremram"

 * – (View MfD)

User talk page that looks like a malformed article. Clearly violates WP:UP. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 09:32, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Check the user's contribution history. .  Good faith or not, everything they have done is trouble to fix.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 10:04, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * I mean, there are other messages there, so it's not like we're going to delete someone's user talk page. I might say Move the material to a sandbox typically, but it looks like (a) it's already been copied into mainspace, and (b) it's a copyright violation (see here; I just added a second CSD tag for that to the mainspace page). So remove and revdel I guess? &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 03:22, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Maybe split the talk page to a draft (Draft:G. Prem Kumar)? --Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 05:29, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:FAKEARTICLE. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:53, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment. I think I've finished cleaning this up – all versions of his autobiography were copyright violations., we don't normally delete user talk pages; in most cases, problem content is simply removed. May I ask you to withdraw this nomination? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:39, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.