Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:113.211.150.217/Sample page

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy delete. CSD G3. Liz Read! Talk! 05:39, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

User talk:113.211.150.217/Sample page

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Nonsense page created by a disruptive user who has been blocked elsewhere before (see also Talk:Muhammad Alif Adha Bin Samad). CMD (talk) 02:37, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete - The New Pages Feed sometimes causes some attention to useless stuff, resulting in almost useless requests to delete it. But this is useless.  Robert McClenon (talk) 16:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete G3, per WP:DENY, it’s a scratchpad for a vandal-troll. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep, due to the block being only 31 hours, and the nominator not mentioning this. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:28, 9 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Talk:Muhammad Alif Adha Bin Samad doesn’t provide any meaningful insight. SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:30, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
 * What should I have specifically mentioned? It's a random test page from someone who puts "Muhammad Alif Adha Bin Samad" into various pages . Not sure how the block length factors into this. CMD (talk) 02:54, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * User:Chipmunkdavis, MfD often receives nominations citing a user being blocked, and these look like someone trying to do shadow SPI clerking. The block matters because you introduced it as a deletion reason. If the IP becomes unblocked and subsequently a good editor, the IP’s talk subpage becomes justifiable.
 * If there is more to this, then make an SPI case. If there is nothing more to this, then deleting userspace subpages for being nonsense is not a productive use of MfD. An awful lot of nonsense is tolerated in userspace. SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * There's no SPI for this, it's not a nefarious attempt to skirt restrictions, it's disruptiveness through test edits. It's also not a fixed IP, so there's no link between this specific userpage and the individual. If they become a good editor it'll be at yet another IP. This is a pretty clear mixture of WP:DEL-REASONs 3 and 4, and borderline G1. I nominated this assuming it would be pretty procedural, but if you want to keep this page I am happy for this to be closed. CMD (talk) 04:09, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I think I see now. The page content is practice for the vandalism they went on to do. I’m happy to call that a WP:G3 Vandalism and WP:DENY. I advise speedying and not MfD-ing per WP:DENY. SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:18, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.