Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:114.108.217.80

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. Clear consensus to remove this content; going for deletion over blanking solely because of headcount as I don't see compelling reasons for either keeping or deleting the history. Of course, adding welcomes and proper notifications post-deletion is fine. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:52, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

User talk:114.108.217.80

 * – (View MfD)

Spamming / Improper use of talk page CrispyCream27  (Talk) 03:56, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Ewww. I think this page gave me cancer. Speedy delete U5. WP:NOTWEBHOST. Other than a handful of edits in August 2014 (and probably from a different person), all this IP's edits are trolling, so I also suggest a temporary block. -Crossroads- (talk) 04:36, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Blank and IP-welcome. Newcomers with energy should be welcomed.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:56, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. I respectfully disagree with User:SmokeyJoe that "Newcomers with energy should be welcomed".  That is true if they are here to contribute to the encyclopedia.  It is hard to tell what this IP is here for, but they appear to be not here to contribute to the encyclopedia.  Please suggest how to direct this IP, if indeed there is a human rather than a bot behind the edits.  Robert McClenon (talk) 13:47, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Do not insult the vandals. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * User:SmokeyJoe - I didn't say to insult the vandal. That essay says to ignore the vandal.  That isn't the same as welcoming the vandal, which seems just silly.  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * No, you didn't. I was looking at the 4th and 5th dot points.  "vandals can do an about-face" and "... be nice".  It's nice to be welcomed, I hold firm to the minority view that all account registrants should be auto-welcomed.  I would also auto-welcome all IPs on their first edit.  I welcomed the IP.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:55, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Genseric could be negotiated with, but that is irrelevant. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:11, 11 October 2019 (UTC)


 * Blank this, it doesn't need to be deleted but who knows what is going on there, that's a huge page for no reason. Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 20:14, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete and block this person. If this person does it again ban this person forever.Catfurball (talk) 18:18, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment - User:Catfurball has made a silly statement. "If this person does it again ban this person forever."  We don't indefinitely block IP addresses, and how do you ban an unregistered editor?  Robert McClenon (talk) 02:08, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.