Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:115.112.231.108

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep - Wrong venue. The correct place to report repeated vandalism is over at WP:AIV. -- Mdann 52   talk to me!  12:19, 14 May 2014 (UTC) (non-admin closure)

User talk:115.112.231.108


IP Please see the warnings placed in the talk page here. Vishal Bakhai - Works 10:36, 12 May 2014 (UTC) Vishal Bakhai - Works 10:36, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - This IP user talk page is being used exactly for what it is meant for. I see no reason for deletion, and the nomination itself is complete;y unclear as to why it should be deleted. -- Whpq (talk) 13:25, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * What I requested was to block this IP. Since I requested via mobile, I believe the tag came incorrectly. This IP is doing nothing but vandalism. Note that it has been issued warnings numerous times from 2012. Please block indefinite. Danke. Vishal Bakhai - Works[[

Image:Flag_of_India.svg|15px]]

19:03, 12 May 2014 (UTC)


 * What you have done is submitted the talk page for deletion, not request a block. I suggest you withdraw this nomination, and then carefully post at WP:AIV. -- Whpq (talk) 22:45, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep - My understanding of policy is that IP talk pages should be archived or blanked, not deleted. Deleting just makes it hard for regular users to see the history without real benefit. If vandalism is an issue report it at WP:AIV. However, they will just tell you that this particular IP has not been appropriately warned and has had no edits after being warned. I would suggest you review the links at the top of WP:AIV.  IP addresses are assumed to change users frequently. Perhaps you were thinking of a different IP?
 * I did look at the few of the edits it had made which were still current. I reverted 2 of 3.  The third was unclear as to being vandalism. In a quick Google search I was unable to verify the information removed in that edit. &mdash; Makyen (talk) 05:24, 13 May 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.